|
Brooklyn Rabbis Letter
|
|
 |
Believe this letter from five misinformed Rabbis and you would think the Israelis are ‘just and noble occupiers'. In response, Brooklyn For Peace lays out the facts: Just because it's ‘Area C' doesn't mean it's legal. Settlement and expropriation are not lawful activities.
In the Brooklyn Paper July 23—29,
2010 About the Protest of Israeli Beauty
Products on Montague Street
Over the second week of July, at 107 Montague Street,
Ricky's, part of a tri-state chain which sells
beauty products, was picketed by activists in solidarity
with “Stolen Beauty”, a campaign against the
sale of Israeli Ahava products because some are manufactured
in the West Bank.
What is the background of “Stolen Beauty”?
“Stolen Beauty” is organized by CODEPINK,
a US women's movement, as part of “BDS –
Boycott, Divestment and Sanction for Palestine,”
an international coalition. Since its founding in July
2005, BDS has helped to organize, all over the world,
boycotts of Israeli intellectuals and artists, the removal
of Israeli films from film festivals, divestment from
Israeli companies by churches and universities, and
cancellation of concerts in Israel by international
stars.
BDS does not take a position on positive attempts to
resolve the decades old Israeli-Palestinian conflict,
such as the proposal for a two state solution. It singles
out only one side, and one side collectively, from soldiers
to scholars, for blame and punishment.
It is therefore distressing, although not surprising,
that CODEPINK ignores the history and legal status of
Mizpeh Shalom, where the Ahava products in question
are manufactured. In fact, Mizpeh Shalom is an Israeli
Kibbutz founded in 1970 in an uninhabited area alongside
the Dead Sea, near the sourthern boundary of the West
Bank. According to the Oslo II accords, signed in 1995
by Israel and the Palestinian Authority, Mizpeh Shalom
is part of “Area C”, a huge section of the
West Bank over which Israel, again by joint agreement,
was granted full control, except over Palestinian civilians.
As Rabbis, we pray and work for an end to the insecurit
of Israelis and the sufferings of Palestinians. This
will not come about through movements which are one-sided,
and which would rather demonize and blacklist, rather
than focus on effective, realistic political change.
Meanwhile, we encourage you to purchase Ahava products
at Ricky's, and to contact Dom Costello, Ricky's
CEO, at 212 352 8545 X8 or by leaving a comment at Rickysnyc.com
(click on “log in” and then “contact
us”). Tell Ricky's that you expect them to
give Israeli products the same access as those of any
other democratic, law abiding country.
B'Shalom, In Peace
Rabbi Andy Bachman Congregation Beth Elohim |
Rabbi Ellen Lippman Kolot Chayeinu |
Rabbi Carie Carter
Park Slope Jewish Center |
Rabbi Joseph Potasnik
Congregation Mount Sinai |
Rabbi Linda Henry Goodman
Union Temple |
Rabbi Sam Weintraub
Kane Street Synagogue |
Rabbi Serge Lippe
Brooklyn Heights Synagogue |
Congregations are for purposes of identification
only |
|
 |
Response from Brooklyn for Peace to Above
Letter
A statement from Brooklyn For Peace
In Reply to the Seven Rabbis
The July 23-29, 2010, Brooklyn Paper carried a letter
signed by seven rabbis criticizing the boycott of Ahava
Cosmetics as one-sided and suggesting that because the
region of the West Bank where Ahava products are manufactured
in an Israeli settlement is "Area C" under
the Oslo Accords, therefore the area belongs to Israel.
What follows is a reply from Brooklyn For Peace.
Brooklyn For Peace (BFP) renews its call to boycott
Ahava products. We are returning to Ricky's on
Montague Street in Brooklyn to press that chain to cease
selling these illegally produced items. BFP has read
the open letter of several rabbis against this boycott
and, among the signatories, we recognize the names of
people who have often stood up publicly for justice
and reconciliation. We have asked for dialogue and discussion
with the signatories we know best, not the sort of discussion
in which people shout across each other, but rather,
an honest exchange. However, while we await a response
to our request for dialogue, we continue our campaign,
because the Israeli Occupation of the West Bank and
East Jerusalem and the horrific siege of Gaza continue
unabated. As taxpayers and American citizens whose government
is funding this Occupation, we feel a sense of urgency
and responsibility in peaceful yet vigorous campaigns
to bring pressure to bear to end the Occupation of Palestinian
territory and its abuses.
The abuse that probably poses the greatest threat to
the possibility for peace between Israelis and Palestinians
has been the constantly expanding settlement of Palestinian
lands by Israelis who, with the backing of their government,
take control of an area and its resources. Contrary
to the rabbis' letter, Ahava products are, in fact,
produced through unlawful appropriation of resources
of the Occupied West Bank by a settlement located in
the Occupied West Bank, under a partnership with organizations
that profit from and fund the settlement of the West
Bank. Specifically, Ahava's manufacturing facility
is located in Mitzpe Shalem, which is located in the
West Bank. Two West Bank settlements (Mitzpe Shalem
and Kalia) own 44.69% of the stock in Ahava—Dead
Sea Laboratories Ltd, according to certificates from
the Israeli Registrar of Companies. Another 37% of Ahava
is held by Hamashbir Holdings, an investment fund that
also invests in the export of agricultural products
from West Bank settlements.
What is the applicable law? As the Israeli High Court
of Justice acknowledged in a 2005 decision, the West
Bank is “held by the State of Israel in belligerent
occupation.” Consequently, as the Court stated,
the legal regime that applies there is determined by
public international law regarding belligerent occupation,
including the Fourth Geneva Convention. Article 49 of
the Fourth Geneva Convention states: “The Occupying
Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own
civilian population into the territory it occupies.”
Thus, all of the Israeli settlements in the West Bank,
including Miztpe Shalem and Kalia, exist in violation
of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Under the Convention,
the only legitimate interests and duties of the occupying
power concern the security needs of the people in the
home territory of that power and the needs of the people
being occupied. Settlement and expropriation of resources
by civilians from the home territory are not lawful
activities, and serve no security purpose for Israel.
The consequences of the illegal settlement of the West
Bank are not theoretical. Apart from the day-to-day
hardships that the settlement infrastructure has created
for Palestinians and the persistent violent harassment
of Palestinians by settlers, the settlements are perhaps
the single greatest obstacle to peace.
The letter from the Brooklyn rabbis seeks to muddy the
status, and therefore the role, of Mitzpe Shalem in
obstructing peace. The letter correctly states that
Mitzpe Shalem is located in what the now-defunct Oslo
Accords had designated as Area C, the area in which
all the illegal settlements are located. While the Oslo
Accords initially placed that area under Israeli military
control as part of a phased transition to Palestinian
control, the Accords never transferred sovereignty over
Area C to the Israeli government, as the 2005 High Court
decision demonstrates. In any event, the transfer of
Area C was blocked in 2000, by the Israeli government
under the leadership of the current Prime Minister,
Benyamin Netanyahu, and the Oslo process came to an
end. To suggest that Mitzpe Shalem is not illegal because
it may someday be part of some future agreement is,
at best, wishful thinking. The West Bank remains Occupied
territory; the settlements remain illegal; there can
be no peace agreement as long as Israel continues its
settlement project. Mitzpe Shalem remains an obstacle
to peace, not part of the solution.
The rabbis criticize the boycott movement for not taking
a position on “positive attempts to resolve the
decades old Israeli-Palestinian conflict. . . .”
In fact, our Ahava boycott campaign is precisely a positive
attempt to remove one of the greatest obstacles to peace--the
illegal settlement of the West Bank--and to restore
a commitment to international law and respect for human
rights. There can be no positive move toward peace without
a commitment to law and human rights. The rabbis' misguided
call to support Israel by buying these illegally produced
products for the profit of illegal settlements is antithetical
to any call for peace or justice. And there can be no
peace without justice.
We therefore renew our call to boycott Ahava products.
September 28, 2010
Brooklyn For Peace
718-624-5921 www.brooklynpeace.org
|
| |