Abigail Disney to donate corpus and profits from Ahava
Dead Sea Laboratories towards fighting illegal exploitation of Palestinian
land and resources.
Press Advisory from Stolen Beauty Ahava Boycott Campaign
Monday, July 16, 2012, New York City
Contact: Nancy Kricorian, Stolen Beauty Campaign manager nancy[at]stolenbeauty.org
| 646-234-8529
Abigail Disney, a principal investor of Shamrock Holdings Incorporated,
the Roy E. Disney family fund, announced today that she is disclaiming
her share of Shamrock's investment in Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories. Ahava,
an Israeli cosmetics firm with its factory and visitors center in an illegal
West Bank settlement, is a privately held corporation. Shamrock owns about
18.5% of the company. (Approximately 37% is held by the West Bank settlement
of Mitzpe Shalem, 37% by Hamashbir Holdings, and 7.5% by Kalia, another
illegal West Bank settlement.)
Abigail Disney's statement:
“Recent evidence from the Israeli Civil Administration documents
that Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories sources mud used in its products from
the Occupied shores of the Dead Sea, which is in direct contravention
to provisions in The Hague Regulations and the Geneva Conventions forbidding
the exploitation of occupied natural resources. While I will always hold
my colleagues and coworkers in the highest regard, I cannot in good conscience
profit from what is technically the ‘plunder' or ‘pillage'
of occupied natural resources and the company's situating its factory
in an Israeli settlement in the Occupied West Bank. Because of complicated
legal and financial constraints I am unable to withdraw my investment
at this time, but will donate the corpus of the investment as well as
the profits accrued to me during the term of my involvement to organizations
working to end this illegal exploitation.”
Since 2009, Ahava has been the subject of an international boycott campaign
because of the company's illegal practices. Ahava's brand has
been tarnished by bad publicity and a series of international setbacks.
In January of 2012 a group of prominent U.K. academics and intellectuals
denounced Ahava's collaboration in an E.U.-funded research project.
In February 2012, the company lost its Japanese distributor because of
controversy surrounding Ahava's illegal practices. In April, Norway's
Vita chain announced it would no longer stock Ahava products. In May the
United Methodist Church voted to boycott Israeli settlement products,
and in July the Presbyterian Church (USA) followed suit, specifically
naming Ahava in its settlement boycott resolution. Also in May of this
year, Who Profits, a project of the Israeli Coalition of Women for Peace
released a new investigative report entitled, “Ahava: Tracking the
Trade Trail of Settlement Products.” Around the same time, South
Africa's Minister of Trade and Industry announced new labeling rules
for Israeli settlement goods; Ahava was mentioned by name as a company
whose goods were fraudulently labeled as “Product of Israel”
when their place of origin is the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Only
last week a prominent U.K. jurist presented an opinion paper stating that
it was legal for the U.K. and the E.U. to ban Israeli settlement products,
a position that suggests further scrutiny of Ahava's participation
in an E.U.-funded nanotechnology research project.
|